scott@vtx-cpd.com
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Replying to Katherine Howie 26/05/2024 - 21:00
Hi Kath,
Thanks for elaborating on this. It’s a great reminder that even without all the advanced monitors, we can still gather crucial information through thorough physical exams and assessing perfusion parameters. Your point about hypotension only appearing after a significant drop in cardiac output is really important—it’s good to remember that a patient can be hypoperfused even with normal blood pressure.
I completely agree that hands-on assessments and repeated serial physical exams are invaluable. It’s reassuring to know that these fundamental skills can provide us with so much insight into a patient’s cardiovascular status.
Thanks again for sharing your expertise!
Best regards,
Scott
Replying to Katherine Howie 26/05/2024 - 20:51
Hi Kath,
Thanks for sharing your insights! Your perspective is super helpful and really highlights the importance of keeping a close eye on patients at risk of developing SIRS or sepsis, especially those with ongoing inflammation, hypoxia, or hypotension. Your experience with the unexpected pancreatitis case is a great reminder of how quickly things can change and how crucial it is to stay vigilant.
Thanks again for sharing!
Scott 🙂
Replying to Raquel M. 25/05/2024 - 15:34
Hi there,
Thanks for your question! Urine dipstick strips that differentiate between RBCs, hemoglobin, and myoglobin based on the pattern of the color change can be quite useful in a clinical setting. These strips can provide a quick and easy way to get a preliminary assessment of hematuria versus hemoglobinuria or myoglobinuria.
However, there are a few points to keep in mind:
Accuracy: While dipstick tests can be helpful, they are not always 100% accurate. False positives and false negatives can occur, so it’s important to confirm any suspicious results with more definitive testing, such as microscopic examination of the urine sediment or additional blood tests.
Interference: Various substances in the urine, such as certain medications, foods, or contamination, can sometimes interfere with the results of the dipstick test.
Clinical Context: Always interpret dipstick results within the broader clinical context. For example, the presence of RBCs in the urine should be correlated with clinical signs and other diagnostic findings to determine the underlying cause.
Follow-Up: If the dipstick test indicates the presence of hemoglobin or myoglobin, further testing may be needed to determine the source. Conditions like hemolysis or muscle damage can cause these substances to appear in the urine, and additional diagnostics will be necessary to address the underlying issue.
In summary, urine dipstick strips can be a valuable tool for initial screening, but they should be used alongside other diagnostic methods to ensure accurate and comprehensive assessment.
Hope this helps, and feel free to ask if you have any more questions!
Best regards,
Scott 🙂
Replying to Helen D. 28/05/2024 - 15:09
Let me see what Arron’s thoughts are!
Scott 🙂
Replying to Helen D. 28/05/2024 - 14:39
Hey Helen.
I have also experienced faecal catheters being pushed out in some cases. They can indeed be quite useful for assessing fluid loss in severe diarrhoea to help with fluid calculations. Some of my colleagues have tried instilling lidocaine into the rectum to help keep the catheter in place. This might be something worth trying in your practice as well.
Scott 🙂
Replying to Raquel M. 21/05/2024 - 02:48
Hello.
I think it depends on the disease process. Often with fluid and air there is no need to as there is communication between sides. In very inflamed cases (pyothorax) there can be issues with this communication and both sides need drained or two chest drains need placed.
Scott 🙂
Replying to Talia C. 17/05/2024 - 15:39
HAHAHAHAHA!
Scott 🙂
Replying to Helen S. 14/05/2024 - 09:22
Hi,
Thanks for the recommendation! I’ll definitely check out Black Box Thinking by Matthew Syed to learn more about the theory of Marginal gains. Diary of a CEO by Steven Bartlett also sounds interesting and worth a read.
Have you found any specific insights from these books particularly helpful in your practice?
Scott x
Replying to Katherine Howie 12/05/2024 - 21:19
Hi Kath,
I completely agree with you.
Recognizing patients at risk for SIRS or sepsis is crucial. Your red flag system sounds very effective—persistent tachycardia and other unresponsive parameters are definitely key indicators to watch for.
Cats are definitely more challenging compared to dogs. Their clinical signs can be so subtle and different, making it harder to detect early signs of deterioration. Continuous monitoring and being vigilant about any changes in their behavior or vitals are essential.
I’m curious about the red flag system you use—is this a defined system with set parameters, or is it more of an intuitive approach based on experience?
Best regards,
Scott
Replying to Katherine Howie 12/05/2024 - 21:11
Hi Kath,
Indeed, xenotransfusions have a fascinating history! Early in the history of transfusion medicine, there were attempts to use animal blood for human transfusions. One of the most notable cases involved Jean-Baptiste Denis, a French physician who, in the 17th century, transfused sheep blood into humans. This was done with the hope that the animal blood could cure a variety of ailments, including “stupidity.” Unfortunately, these attempts often ended in failure and even death due to severe immune reactions.
I do wonder sometimes about the progression of treatment for human “stupidity”—have we come that far?
Best regards,
Scott
Replying to Raquel M. 23/05/2024 - 22:49
Hi there,
I’m glad to hear you’re doing well! Yes, avoiding the hamstring muscles in cats and dogs when administering intramuscular injections is indeed a common practice. It’s interesting to hear that some students from North America were not familiar with this approach. While it’s a well-established practice in many veterinary settings, it’s possible that variations in training and protocols exist across different regions and educational programs.
If you have any further questions or need clarification on this or any other topic, feel free to ask!
Best regards,
Scott 🙂
Hello Raquel,
Great question! The method for measuring urine specific gravity (USG) with a refractometer can indeed vary.
Using a drop of urine prior to centrifugation is a quick and convenient method. However, it may not provide accurate results if there is debris or sediment present in the urine sample, as this can affect the refractive index. On the other hand, using the supernatant after centrifugation removes any sediment or debris, potentially providing more accurate USG measurements.
The decision to use one method over the other may depend on factors such as the condition of the urine sample and the specific requirements of the case. In some situations, such as when analyzing urine with visible sediment, using the post-centrifugation method may be preferred to obtain more accurate results.
Using both methods and comparing the two values can be a useful approach, especially if there are discrepancies between the measurements. This can help ensure the reliability of the USG measurement and provide additional information about the composition of the urine sample.
Ultimately, The vast majority of samples are analyzed pre-centrifuge. I would routinely do it before centrifuge.
Hope this helps!
Scott 🙂
Hello Raquel,
Urine dipstick tests for animals can indeed differentiate between hemoglobin/myoglobin and red blood cells (RBCs), although their accuracy can vary depending on factors such as the specific dipstick used and the condition of the sample. Generally, these dipstick tests can detect the presence of blood in the urine, which may indicate bleeding or other underlying conditions.
Freshly collected urine that is red, brown, or black suggests the presence of blood, hemoglobin, myoglobin, or some of their degradation products. The urine concentration, pH, and time in contact with blood can affect color. Red blood cells progressively disintegrate and release hemoglobin in urine, which may be oxidized to methemoglobin and result in brown or black urine color. A negative reagent strip test for blood in red, black, or brown urine suggests the presence of a chromogen other than hemoglobin or myoglobin.
A positive reagent strip test for blood should be followed by analysis of the urine sediment. If the discoloration is due to hematuria, there will be numerous red blood cells and increased turbidity. In contrast, urine remains transparent when the color change is due to hemoglobinuria. If no red blood cells are present on microscopic examination of the urine sediment, hemoglobin or myoglobin should be suspected.
I would suggest additional investigations to differentiate these possibilities, such as ruling out oxidized bilirubin and analyzing serum bilirubin concentration. Furthermore, examination of the plasma color may aid in differentiating these explanations. If the discolored urine is due to myoglobin, the plasma will usually be clear because myoglobin is not bound significantly to proteins and is rapidly excreted.
If plasma from a non-traumatic venipuncture sample is pink, it is suggestive of hemoglobin. Hemoglobinemia and hemoglobinuria are indicative of significant intravascular hemolysis, resulting from various conditions such as immune-mediated destruction of red blood cells or fragmentation due to microangiopathic conditions.
Overall, I would use the dipstick as a guide and not to definitively determine the difference between blood and hemoglobin.
Best regards,
Scott 🙂
Hello!
I hope you are well.
Yes, avoiding intramuscular injections in the caudal thigh area to prevent iatrogenic sciatic nerve damage is a prudent practice in both dogs and cats. The sciatic nerve is located in close proximity to this region, and inadvertent injection into or near the nerve can lead to significant complications. Instead, opting for alternate injection sites with less risk, such as the quadriceps or lumbar muscles, can help mitigate this potential risk.
I tend to avoid this injection site altogether. Instead, I opt for the lumbar muscles, which are generally better tolerated and present fewer risks.
Scott 🙂
Replying to Hannah Willetts 23/05/2024 - 14:54
Hi Hannah,
In cases where clear clinical signs persist despite initial calcium supplementation, addressing the immediate symptoms takes precedence over concerns regarding mineralization. The risk of inducing hypercalcemia and subsequent mineralization issues is generally lower in these acute scenarios compared to prolonged exposure. In situations where further IV calcium is considered necessary but repeat EPOC (iCa) testing isn’t feasible due to financial constraints, you might consider a cautious approach.
One option could be to administer a lower dose of IV calcium, perhaps titrated to the patient’s response and clinical signs, while closely monitoring for any signs of hypercalcemia. Additionally, supportive treatments such as fluids and monitoring electrolyte levels may be beneficial.
It’s always a balancing act between providing adequate treatment and avoiding potential complications, so individualized patient care and close monitoring are key.
Best regards,
Scott
-
AuthorPosts