scott@vtx-cpd.com
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
Hey.
I would totally agree, I think a longer-acting insulin is the way to go in this case. I wonder whether ProZinc may be the next choice (due to licensing and ease of dosing)? If ProZinc, I would start with 0.25IU/kg BID. If considering the insulin analogs glargine (0.3IU/kg BID) or detimir (0.1IU/kg BID) the main challenges are going to be dosing (less of an issue in dogs compared to cats). Main thing is not to dilute the insulin in any way. The nadir will still vary (especially in this patient). I would monitor as you are doing with BG curves and be super aware of the possibility of hypoglycaemia in the initial stages.
Hope that helps.
Scott 🙂
Thank you Magda and Michael.
I will see if we have any more thoughts before revealing the next bit!
Scott 🙂
Really interesting case!
Could you send the timings of the most recent BG curve results. When is the dog fed?
Scott 🙂
I knew that is what you meant!
Scott 🙂
Hey.
Yes, it is the Freestyle Libre 2.
Scott x
Hello.
Using the single value to increase dose can be challenging. A single blood glucose measurement is rarely useful in monitoring DM with the exception of finding a low result, always indicative of an overdose. Single glucose measurements may be sufficient when an owner believes the dog is virtually asymptomatic, the PE is unremarkable and serum fructosamine levels are between 360 to 450 mcmol/L. In such cases, glucose concentrations between 10 and 14 mmol/l around the time of the insulin injection are consistent with good glycemic control and additional blood glucose measurements are not usually necessary.
Hope you are having a lovely weekend.
Scott 🙂
Kerida,
Thank you so much for your kind words.
We really appreciate the support.
Have a lovely weekend.
Scott 🙂
Hello.
Hope you are well. Sorry for the delay in getting back to you. Overall, the pre insulin glucose and clinical signs might be a better way to go. The problem with the 6h post insulin, is that this one result can be very variable. Remember, the main issue normally in the initial stages of treatment is avoiding hypoglycaemia.
In the more stable patients, I would be happy to rely on the fructosamine and clinical signs. Again, there may be some use in the pre-insulin BG value if other monitoring is not possible. Ultimately, a BG curse will give you more information.
Overall, clinical signs really are the most important part of this. There is definitely not a one size fits all!
Hope that helps.
Scott 🙂
Kerida!
I am so excited that this all went well with the sensor!!!
I am really happy to help with the interpretation of the results too, let me know.
Scott 🙂
Hey Alice.
So sorry for the delay. I normally place BG sensors in cats behind the head at the back of the neck. Is that what you would normally do? I would then cover it with a bit of dressing around the neck like when we bandage in an oesophageal feeding tube. Does that make sense? I have popped a picture below:
Hope that helps.
Scott 🙂
Kerida…
There are many benefits of being a vintage vet! I too need to brush up on my cardiology knowledge.
Scott 🙂
It is a really good question.
In this situation, particularly of the renal parameters are normal and there is not an ‘obvious’ other problem from basic bloods then I probably would be treating the calcium, even without a definitive diagnosis. The reason for running the PTH and PTHrp is often as part of the exclusion process in the diagnosis of idiopathic hypercalcemia.
So, in this case, where cash is limited, it would not be ridiculous to start aledronate.
Hope that helps.
Scott 🙂
Really good question!
What was the ionised calcium value?
Were the renal parameters normal?Scott 🙂
Hello!
My name is Scott, I am one of the other directors of vtx. I am a specialist in internal medicine and had the great joy of doing my residency with Liz. I am often the one delivering the lectures, so it is going to be lovely to be the one listening! Cardiology is definitely a weak area for me! I am excited to learn.
Scott
Great question!
Persistent fasting hyperlipidemia is abnormal and can be either primary or secondary to other diseases or drug administration. Secondary hyperlipidemia is the most common form of hyperlipidemia in dogs. Most commonly, secondary canine hyperlipidemia is the result of an endocrine disorders. Primary lipid abnormalities are usually, but not always, associated with certain breeds. Depending on the breed, the prevalence of a primary lipid abnormality can vary widely. Primary hyperlipidemia is very common in Miniature Schnauzers. Primary hyperlipidemia in the Miniature Schnauzer is typically characterized by hypertriglyceridemia with or without hypercholesterolemia. Primary hyperlipidemias have also been reported in Shetland Sheepdogs (in Japan and possibly other countries), Beagles, Briards, a family of rough-coated Collies from the United Kingdom,18 and anecdotally in Doberman Pinschers and Rottweilers.
Hyperlipidemia itself does not seem to lead directly to the development of major clinical signs, it has been shown to be associated with the development of other diseases that are clinically important and potentially life-threatening. Hyperlipidemia, and more specifically hypertriglyceridemia, has long been suspected as a risk factor for canine pancreatitis. The results of two recent clinical studies provided stronger evidence that hypertriglyceridemia, especially when severe (>900 mg/dL), is a risk factor for pancreatitis in Miniature Schnauzers. Therefore, severe hypertriglyceridemia in Miniature Schnauzers should be treated even when clinical signs are not present, due to the risk of developing pancreatitis. In summary, I would treat (mostly with low-fat diet) in Miniature Schnauzers.
In other breeds, a more general and wide selection of tests might be necessary for patients that have vague or no clinical signs. It should be noted that dogs with hyperlipidemia are often clinically healthy. It is likely that at least some of these dogs have some form of primary hyperlipidemia. If it is mild or moderate, there may be no need for detailed diagnostic investigations. If hypercholesterolemia is the main abnormality (without or with only mild hypertriglyceridemia), then it is more likely that the dog has some form of secondary hyperlipidemia, warranting recommendations for further diagnostic investigation.
I hope that helps a little bit. Let me know if that makes sense.
Scott 🙂
-
AuthorPosts