vtx logo

request clinical advice

vtx logo sticky

scott@vtx-cpd.com

Forum Replies Created

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 2,393 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Laura S. 06/01/2026 - 13:48

    Laura!

    Thank you so much for this! Brilliant suggestions. I really appreciate you taking the time to reply.

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Emma Johnstone 23/12/2025 - 15:20

    Hi Emma,

    You’re very welcome, I’m glad it was helpful.

    With respect to darbepoetin, when it does work the response can be quite variable. In non neoplastic or renal cases you may see a meaningful rise in PCV over two to four weeks, sometimes in the order of a five to ten percent increase, but in dogs with lymphoma the response is far less predictable and often modest at best. If there is bone marrow infiltration or significant inflammatory cytokine driven suppression, the effect is frequently blunted or absent. Even when a response is seen, it is usually short lived unless the underlying disease is being controlled, so we are generally talking weeks rather than months. There is also the ongoing concern about antibody formation, thromboembolic risk, and the monitoring burden, which is why I tend to reserve darbepoetin for very select scenarios and would not routinely pursue it in a purely palliative lymphoma setting.

    For omega three supplementation, I usually dose based on the combined EPA and DHA content rather than total fish oil volume. A commonly used target is around fifty to one hundred milligrams per kilogram per day of combined EPA and DHA. In practice, for a medium to large dog this often equates to a few standard fish oil capsules daily, depending on the specific product. I do not have a single must use brand, but I tend to favour veterinary labelled products where the EPA and DHA content is clearly stated, as this makes dosing much easier and more consistent. Products such as EicosaCaps are a reasonable example of this approach.

    You are absolutely right about capromorelin in the UK. Access has become very limited, and many wholesalers no longer stock it. We used to obtain it from places like Raman Pharma at https://www.ramanpharma.com/
    , but it no longer seems to be available through UK supply chains or listed on pharmacy websites. As a result, mirtazapine has become the more practical and familiar appetite and nausea support option in most of our patients. I also tend to be a bit cautious with capromorelin in cancer patients anyway, as increasing appetite does not always translate into meaningful weight gain when cancer associated cachexia is driving the process.

    Chlorambucil is definitely easy to forget about in dogs, particularly as many of us associate it more strongly with feline IBD and lymphoma. In dogs with multicentric lymphoma where owners are open to something beyond steroids but are not pursuing full chemotherapy, chlorambucil in combination with prednisolone can be a useful and relatively gentle next step.

    Keep me posted!

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Hi Emma,

    Thanks for sharing the case. Framed purely around comfort and quality of life rather than disease modification, I think much of what you are already doing is very appropriate. Increasing prednisolone closer to a true palliative lymphoma dose in the region of 1.5 to 2 mg/kg/day is entirely reasonable at this stage, particularly given the fairly rapid progression of peripheral lymphadenopathy. This may provide some short-term cytoreduction with improvement in comfort, appetite, and general wellbeing, although I would be clear with the owners that any benefit is likely to be transient and measured in weeks rather than months. Despite the existing PU/PD, proteinuria, and mild azotaemia, I would not withhold escalation of pred purely on that basis if she remains bright and engaged, although increasing the dose cautiously and reassessing clinically is sensible.

    The progressive, non-regenerative anaemia is very consistent with anaemia of chronic disease, possible bone marrow involvement, or cytokine-mediated suppression associated with lymphoma. Unfortunately, there is very little that reliably improves this in the absence of chemotherapy. Cobalamin supplementation is reasonable but is unlikely to meaningfully affect the PCV, and I would generally avoid iron supplementation unless there is clear evidence of deficiency, as it is rarely helpful in this context. While anaemia of chronic disease is the most likely explanation, I do think it is reasonable to keep an open mind about other contributing factors, particularly marrow infiltration or less commonly immune-mediated mechanisms, even though identifying these does not substantially change management in a palliative setting. I have occasionally considered darbepoetin in neoplastic cases, but in lymphoma the evidence for benefit is very limited, and the risks, costs, and logistical burden usually outweigh any potential short-term gain, so I would not routinely pursue this as part of palliation.

    With respect to the kidneys and proteinuria, starting benazepril with a persistently elevated UPC above 5 is entirely appropriate. I would keep expectations modest regarding any improvement in the UPC, but ACE inhibition may help slow further renal decline and can indirectly support comfort. Monitoring blood pressure if feasible is worthwhile, as hypertension can accompany both proteinuric renal disease and neoplasia. I would avoid aggressive dietary protein restriction unless there are clear clinical signs of uraemia, as maintaining appetite, caloric intake, and body condition is usually the higher priority in a palliative context.

    Weight loss and muscle wasting are unfortunately very common in multicentric lymphoma and often progress despite a reasonable appetite. I would prioritise calorie-dense, highly palatable foods over any attempt to adhere to idealised renal or oncology diets. Low-dose mirtazapine can be helpful not only for appetite but also for nausea and overall demeanour, even when intake seems subjectively acceptable. Omega-3 supplementation may offer mild anti-inflammatory and cachexia-modulating benefits, although expectations should remain realistic.

    In terms of additional supportive care, I do not routinely use omeprazole simply because a dog is on steroids, but if the prednisolone dose is increased, or if there are concerns about gastrointestinal comfort, nausea, or appetite consistency, then acid suppression can certainly be considered on a case-by-case basis. Analgesia is worth considering proactively even in the absence of obvious pain, as marked lymphadenopathy and visceral involvement can be uncomfortable. Low-dose gabapentin is often well tolerated, including in dogs with mild renal compromise, and can improve overall comfort and demeanour. Anti-nausea medication can also be helpful if there is any suggestion of nausea or food aversion developing. Appetite stimulants can play a role as the disease progresses and cachexia becomes more prominent. Mirtazapine is generally my first choice in this context. I am more cautious with capromorelin, as stimulating appetite does not necessarily counteract cancer-associated cachexia and can sometimes lead to frustration if increased intake does not translate into weight gain, but it can still be considered if appetite itself becomes a limiting factor for quality of life.

    Overall, I think your current plan is entirely appropriate. Increasing prednisolone, continuing ACE inhibition, and layering supportive and comfort-focused care is realistically as much as we can offer without chemotherapy, and while further improvement in blood parameters is unlikely, maintaining her current brightness and enjoyment for as long as possible is a very reasonable and compassionate goal. From a practical standpoint, if the owners wish to pursue something beyond steroids alone but still avoid full chemotherapy, chlorambucil in combination with prednisolone is the most practical and commonly used metronomic option for multicentric lymphoma, offering the best balance of tolerability and potential benefit. Cyclophosphamide-based metronomic therapy is an alternative but requires more caution, particularly in a dog with proteinuria and renal involvement.

    Hope that helps!

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Laura S. 07/12/2025 - 11:50

    Hi Laura,

    Really interesting case, and only in vet medicine do we get to say “nerf gun bullet enterotomy” with a straight face!

    I completely understand your thought process. Cats add another layer of complexity because we have fewer comfortable multimodal options, and they can be trickier to keep adequately analgesed without stacking side effects.

    A transient pyrexia post enterotomy is not unusual, and I agree that if the cat is bright, eating and clinically well, we often end up making a judgment call in the moment. A single NSAID dose in an otherwise stable cat with good perfusion is unlikely to cause harm, but the theoretical concerns around GI healing are the same as in dogs, reduced mucosal perfusion and possible impact on anastomotic strength are the reasons manufacturers advise caution.

    I think the key is exactly what you have done, good pain control with buprenorphine, careful monitoring,
    and a case by case decision when temperature, comfort and demeanour all point towards needing a bit more support.

    Do let us know how she does!

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Georgina F. 08/12/2025 - 16:00

    Hi Georgie,

    Thanks so much for sharing your experiences, really interesting cases and very helpful to hear. The overlap with ipsilateral KCS and worsening drooling during excitement does sound similar to what we’re seeing with Randall, and your experience reinforces my caution about any surgical duct procedures.

    Good to know MRI was unrewarding in your case too. We’ve started Randall on a very low dose of glycopyrrolate, so I’ll update the thread once we see how he responds.

    Really appreciate your input,

    Scott

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Naomi M. 09/12/2025 - 11:24

    Great choices!!!

    I hope all is well and you are enjoying the course.

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Emma Johnstone 10/12/2025 - 13:40

    Hi Emma,

    That is really helpful, thank you, and fingers crossed you never need to go down the additional-medications route with your cases.

    That is good to know re IDEXX, I had assumed some of the amino acid panels were still being batched and sent on, so it is reassuring to hear you are already getting cystine quantification that way. I will look more closely at their offering next time we are planning monitoring. Laboklin doing the PCR for the known mutations fits with what I had in mind as well, and as you say, they may well be able to help with urine amino acid quantification or at least advise on where they are sending it.

    Have a great weekend!

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Zoe T. 03/12/2025 - 11:47

    Hey Zoe!

    I hope you are enjoying the course!

    I will make sure we answer this question ASAP!

    Have a great weekend.

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Emma Johnstone 03/12/2025 - 16:05

    Hi Emma,

    Thanks so much for sharing your experiences. Bulldogs certainly seem overrepresented in cystine stone cases, and as this study showed, quite a few intact males behave as androgen-dependent (Type III) cystinuria. When that is the case, castration can have a dramatic effect on urinary cystine excretion, and if the cystine:creatinine ratio drops substantially 30 to 90 days after surgery, some dogs may not need to stay on a urinary diet long term. If the ratio does not fall, or if stones recur, then we are probably dealing with Type I or II cystinuria, where diet and sometimes medical therapy become much more important.

    Regarding tiopronin, I have used it on three occasions and unfortunately have always encountered side effects significant enough that we had to stop the drug. I have seen the myopathy twice, presenting as staggering and difficulty chewing. I may have been unlucky, but it has made me cautious. The published adverse-effect profile in dogs is fairly limited, but one retrospective study reported adverse events in around 13 percent of treated dogs. These included proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, anemia, increased liver enzymes and bile acids, lethargy, dermatologic changes such as pustules or a dry crusty nose, behavioural changes including aggression, a sulfur odour to the urine and myopathy. Onset ranged from 1 to 36 months (mean 7.8 months), and effects resolved once the drug was discontinued. Tiopronin has also been associated with Coombs-positive regenerative spherocyte anemia, in which case it must be stopped immediately and the dog treated appropriately.

    Given this, I now reserve tiopronin for dogs that clearly need it after castration and diet have been fully assessed, rather than as a routine addition.

    Do you happen to know which UK laboratories are currently measuring urinary cystine excretion?

    Thanks again.

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Emma Johnstone 03/12/2025 - 16:17

    Hi Emma,

    I agree, this feels particularly promising for those thin, older cats who keep losing weight despite our best efforts to manage their comorbidities. In terms of how it fits alongside mirtazapine, I wouldn’t see capromorelin as a replacement for it but rather as something that can be used concurrently when appropriate. The two agents address different aspects of the problem. Mirtazapine primarily improves appetite and reduces nausea, whereas capromorelin appears to support more than caloric intake alone, helping with anabolic metabolism and lean-mass maintenance, which is often the missing piece in these frail geriatric patients. In that sense, using them together in complex cases can make good clinical sense, particularly where both appetite drive and body condition are concerns.

    There are situations where I would reach for capromorelin first. If a cat is eating reasonably well but continues to lose weight, or if sarcopenia is the predominant issue rather than appetite suppression, capromorelin becomes the more compelling starting point. Similarly, in cats whose owners are reluctant to use mirtazapine due to previous side effects such as agitation or vocalisation, or in patients with conditions like heart disease where maintaining lean mass is beneficial but nutritional strategies alone are insufficient, capromorelin can fill a useful gap.

    Other practical factors come into play as well. Cost may influence decision-making for some owners, and the availability of transdermal mirtazapine is very attractive to many, particularly those who struggle with oral medications or have cats who are difficult to pill. That convenience often encourages mirtazapine use earlier in the treatment pathway. Even so, there are definitely cases where I use the combination, especially during the initial stabilisation period or when weight gain has stalled despite good appetite support.

    If appetite suppression is the primary problem, mirtazapine usually remains my first step. But for the large group of cats who sit in that grey zone, eating, yet progressively losing weight or muscle, capromorelin adds something we haven’t had before, and it will be interesting to see how people begin integrating it more broadly as experience grows.

    Scott

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Emma Johnstone 03/12/2025 - 16:43

    Thank you for the reply, Emma, and I hope life in practice is going well. Hopefully you won’t be working too much over Christmas!

    I think that’s a very reasonable and thoughtful take. I agree that 18 IU BID isn’t excessive for a dog of that size, especially when the clinical signs are stable, the urine culture is negative, and there are no indications of systemic instability (e.g. weight loss, PU/PD, lethargy).

    I also agree that the fructosamine can be helpful, but in this kind of case where the home BG data looks decent and the patient is clinically doing well, it might not need to be the deciding factor. Repeating it post-dental once inflammation is resolved seems like a fair strategy if needed for reassurance.

    Just to add, fructosamine is not a perfect test. It reflects an average of glycaemic control over the preceding 2–3 weeks, but it can be influenced by factors such as serum protein turnover, inflammation, hyperlipidaemia, and acute glycaemic spikes. It doesn’t always correlate tightly with clinical control, especially in patients with ongoing inflammation or changing insulin sensitivity. In this case, it may well have been elevated due to the chronic oral infection and associated stress response, and I think repeating it after stabilisation makes more sense than relying too heavily on a single result.

    And I’m with you, as long as hydration is good, and we have peri-op BG monitoring in place, I wouldn’t be inclined to delay the dental, particularly if the oral pathology is contributing to discomfort or glycaemic variability. Prioritising the dental for the dog’s comfort feels like the right thing in most cases like this.

    Just to update you, this particular dog did go on to have the dental, which ended up being quite extensive (including multiple extractions and management of an oronasal fistula). She recovered very well and remained clinically stable throughout. Post-operatively, we’ve seen some encouraging improvement in her blood glucose values, although there is still some variability and we’re continuing to monitor. Overall, I do think proceeding with the dental was the right call for her.

    Thanks again for sharing your thoughts!

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Georgina F. 04/12/2025 - 15:20

    Welcome!

    We are so lucky to have you navigate us through this brilliant course!

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Hi Joanne,

    The introducers/tunnelers you’re seeing (MILA ETUN14, ETUN18, etc.) are only for large oesophagostomy tubes (10–30 Fr). They cannot be used for the small 4 Fr and 8 Fr tubes I recommended earlier.

    4–5 Fr and 8 Fr tubes = nasal tubes
    → These are placed directly through the nostril and do NOT need an introducer.
    → Just order the tubes themselves.

    10–14–18–20 Fr tubes = oesophagostomy tubes
    → These do require a tunneler/introducer, and that’s why the sizes start at 12 Fr and up.

    So in short:

    Yes, your clinic can order 4 Fr and 8 Fr tubes — no introducer needed.

    The introducers you found are for a completely different type of feeding tube (E-tubes).

    You only need a tunneler if you plan to place oesophagostomy tubes, not nasal tubes.

    For reference, here is the product link you found (for the oesophagostomy tunneler):
    https://www.milainternational.com/products/esophagostomy-feeding/tunneler-for-length-adjustable-esophagostomy-feeding-tubes.html

    I have popped a MILA discount code below.

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Hi Riley,

    Thanks for sharing this, it was a great read and very timely. I actually had a recent case that pushed me to revisit the SGLT2 literature in more detail, and this paper pulls together a lot of the physiology that we often only reference indirectly. What struck me is how many of the proposed mechanisms, particularly around reducing tubular workload, oxidative stress, and maladaptive hyperfiltration, seem highly relevant to our feline CKD population.

    I ended up starting Senvelgo in a diabetic cat with stable CKD who was also on pred and had a previous SUB placement, which would normally make you hesitate based on the product guidelines. But the cat was eating, hydrated, and difficult to stabilise with insulin, so we trialled it with close monitoring. The cat has done extremely well, and reading this review afterwards really reinforced why that might be the case.

    The cardiology angle you brought up is equally interesting. Given the early and consistent benefits seen in humans with both systolic and diastolic dysfunction, it feels inevitable that these drugs are going to become part of the conversation for late Stage B2 MVD and potentially HCM in cats. The proposed effects on interstitial fluid balance, fibrosis, energetics, and neurohormonal tone all make sense for our cardiac patients, especially as an adjunct rather than a replacement.

    Overall, the physiology presented here suggests we may be underutilising SGLT2 inhibitors in stable CKD and selected cardiac patients, especially where glucose-independent benefits are the goal. Like Liz said, I suspect a lot of the veterinary data is already in the pipeline, and it will be very interesting to see how this class evolves in our clinical protocols.

    Scott 🙂

    scott@vtx-cpd.com
    Keymaster

    Replying to Mihai R. 11/11/2025 - 16:11

    Hello!

    Lovely to hear from you. I hope you are enjoying the course.

    I will make sure Ingrid sees this.

    Scott 🙂

Viewing 15 posts - 1 through 15 (of 2,393 total)